Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Made to Stick: A Book Review


Hey guys! I know I said I would post about 5-Hour Energy but if you are a public relations major you should absolutely read this book!


Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die
Dan and Chip Heath
Random House
New York
2007
291 pages
$26.00

Learning has not been this fun since The Magic School Bus was on the air. Chip and Dan Heath have struck gold with their book, “Made to Stick.” To begin, the Heath brothers use an unfair comparison of a tale of a kidney heist and a paper from a non-profit organization, challenging the reader to try and retell both tales an hour after they read it. Which one will they inevitably describe more accurately? Which one is inherently more memorable? The Heath brothers take concepts like this and break down for the audience why it was memorable and what it means to have a truly “sticky” idea. The book itself is very simple, it is broken up into six sections describing in detail each element of making your ideas stick; these elements include simplicity, unexpectedness, concreteness, credibility, emotions, and tells a story.
A lot of the information and definitions given in the book are seemingly common answers. For instance, in the first chapter entitled Simple, the authors urge their audience to keep their message… well, simple. In no way do they want you to start “dumbing down” your message, they suggest “finding the core of the idea” (Heath & Heath, p. 27). In this chapter, Heath and Heath introduce “Idea Clinics.” The goal of the clinics is to help the audience learn how to make their ideas stickier using visible evidence to “model the process” (Heath & Heath, p. 37). Although the authors do say the reader can safely skip the clinics without losing the effect of the book, the clinics are good references. The second chapter, entitled Unexpected, explains that the easiest and most effective way to get someone’s attention is to change up the pattern of communication. This idea of unexpectedness is emanated in two key ideas of surprise and interest, surprise is what grabs our attention and interest is what keeps it. In this chapter the authors provide numerous ways to maintain that edge of unexpectedness.
The third chapter explains what it means to have a concrete idea. The authors many examples of concrete language, explaining that saying a car has a V-8 engine, is a concrete notion; while a high performance car, is more abstract. The main point of this chapter is proving that solid, concrete ideas are more memorable. It is about supplying you audience with ideas that have one of their five senses involved, everyone knows what the Statue of Liberty looks like, the sounds of a Beatles songs, and the taste of certain foods, so link your message to something tangible. The fourth chapter addresses credibility, where to find it, who already has it, and what to do with it. The ideas supporting the importance of this chapter are pretty self-explanatory; people will be more likely to take you seriously if you have some form of credibility. Chapters five and six talk about emotions and stories which in some cases are very closely linked. Telling stories and tapping into the pathos of your audience will make whatever vehicles you use for your message resonate with them more.
This book was truly a joy to read. The “Idea Clinics” and small exercises with this book made it almost interactive and absolutely made me feel that I actually learned. The book was structured in an easy to follow manner that flowed and logically made sense while you read it. It was not just bits and pieces of information, the authors created an engaging conversation for the readers to learn from. This leads us to the fact that the authors write in a very conversational tone, projecting to the audience that this is not meant to be a dry and unmemorable experience. Heath and Heath did not want this book to feel like their audience was in school and forced to read this text.  It is simply a book full of ‘good to know’ things that can help out anyone in communications, public relations, advertising, and marketing. The examples they use throughout the book utilize well-known companies and real stories so that the audience feels like they are a part of the conversation. However, an issue that could be raised with this book is the degree of informality. Although I personally enjoyed reading the banter and jokes, someone could see this entire book as unprofessional. Another aspect that would lead to an unprofessional perception would be the way the table of contents is set up. If one tried to navigate to a specific section of the book without previously reading the book they would be hard pressed to find Tversky and Shafir’s study on uncertainty because the table of contents reads as follows:

“Chapter 1: Simple
Commander’s Intent. THE low-fare airline. Burying the lead and the inverted pyramid. It’s the economy, stupid. Decision paralysis….”

It goes on like that for 10 more sentences. I understand that the authors are trying to be hip and edgy but it makes it hard to find things if you are not reading straight through.
            In the end, Made to Stick, is a very good book that is fun, educational, and smart. It is a quick read because of easy going tone of the authors. The only real problem I had with it was how the authors wrote the table of contents and that their book could be construed as unprofessional. But as a public relations major I strongly suggest students in business or communications read this book because it will do nothing but help you. 

937

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Facebook is a mudslinger?


Hey guys, sorry it has been so long since my last post, I’ll be posting another entry sometime this weekend to make up for one of them. BUT I found an article that uses the same scope that I do in this blog. The article, written by Guy Berstrom, addresses the incident that Facebook got caught hiring a PR firm to plant "unflattering stories about Google." Interestingly enough, I have not seen anything on this circulating Facebook, I only heard about it when I actually Google search “public relation scandals”
You can access the article at the link below.

http://marketing.about.com/od/crisis_communication/a/facebook-gets-caught-in-pr-scandal.htm

The article asks if hiring a firm to slander another competitor is a public relations "no-no?" Bergstrom says it is not, they just should not have been sneaky about it. And I agree, if you recall I used the GolinHarris pitch booklet as a frame of analysis for some of my previous posts. A big thing to remember about practicing public relations ethically is that there is openness and there is transparency. As I've said before openness is what you tell your audience, transparency is what your audience can find out. GolinHarris urges that we should have trust in transparency. As a firm, recognize that we live in a digital age, we leave digital footprints and being "sneaky" is no longer an option. As an avid Facebook and Google user, it does not really bother me that Facebook wants to get the edge. Just like Apple suing Samsung did not bother me.

Bergstrom suggests that Facebook fire the PR agency. I personally do not think that is necessary, a big part of public relations is image restoration. So maybe they should keep the agency on board and figure out a way to slowly but surely regain their audiences trust. But at the end of the day, this is not a huge deal. I have yet to see anyone boycott Facebook because they want to get ahead. No one was injured, no had gotten sued (at least at this moment) and if anything the big wigs at Facebook got a little embarrassed.

Tune in this weekend to read my thoughts on the 5-Hour Energy debacle. 


Thursday, November 8, 2012

The Pill that Persuades


In the spirit of the “War on Women” and the recent election, I want to discuss the public relation tactics and strategies that were used to put things like birth control at the fingertips of women all over America in the first place.

Margaret Sanger, the mother of birth control, was a birth control activist, sex educator, and a nurse from the 20s to the 60s. She came from a family where her mother was pregnant 18 times, with 7 miscarriages, and died at age 50 from tuberculosis and cervical cancer when Sanger was 20 years old. And in the years following, the birth control movement became evermore prominent.


The tactics employed for this movement began with finding people to support Sanger’s cause and could reach ALL audiences. A good public relations campaign is one that can be effective in the eyes of even those who oppose you. In this particular case, Catholics were the biggest enemies of birth control. A Catholic doctor by the name of John Rock was very excited to help out with the movement and was convinced that he was the answer to getting the Vatican to change its position on birth control.

After the backing of John Rock, marketing was the next step. As I have said in previous posts, marketing and public relations need to work together to be effective. The pill was marketed as something called Enovid, a pill for menstrual disorders. Marketing and public relations had to work together to loosen the Catholic Church’s stance on birth control. Because the church said it was okay to have sex during the “safe period” of your cycle, so why is a pill that ensures a longer safe period so bad? But Pope Paul IV said no, in fact he said “Absolutely not.” And John Rock was devastated; he could not believe that his church would not allow this pill to help women everywhere. But women of the Catholic faith were defiant and soon they were half of the birth control market.

However, the pill took a turn for the worst. Women were beginning to die from the pill. But women wanted to believe so much that it couldn’t be the pill. A public relations campaign was not even necessary to save face and to keep women from buying the pill. It was literally handed out like candy. So women took upon themselves to flood hearings, got in front of every camera possible, protesting in the streets, anything to promote their cause. Their tactics and strategies were heard. Changing the way women were being viewed in the streets, in the government, and in the bedroom. The pill prompted one of the most successful public relations campaigns in the history of women’s liberation.  

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Monte Rifkin


Recently, my blog posts have been pretty negative towards companies and public relation firms. Today I want to highlight a company in a positive way. Recently, Monte Rifkin, president of MJ Rifkin, agreed to let me interview him on certain aspects of what his company does and how it operates.
Rifkin owns a full service Ad agency in Chicago. So if you are wondering to yourself, advertising is not the same thing as public relations, you would be right. But what I have learned in my classes so far is that public relations, advertising, and marketing all need to work together in order to have a successful business. And MJ Rifkin’s mission statement reflects this point.
“M J Rifkin, Incorporated was developed to provide the “right arm” business services to clientele who wish to have access to the best, most current marketing resources, without spending a fortune on creating them in-house. We keep you ahead of the curve, using the latest technologies, proven performers, quality partners, and world-class service. Please take a few moments to browse our site, and we think that you’ll agree. Our goal is to make you successful…for the long run”

The clientele that is typical for MJ Rifkin isn’t really typical at all. They will help you with your business no matter what it is. You can access their services at the previously cited website.
During the interview, I asked him the obvious question, what does your company do? What kind of clientele do you have… blah blah blah. But what struck me most, was how he motivates his employees.
PASSION
Rifkin’s employees are all over the country, every week Rifkin holds a teleconference that begins with how everyone is doing, what’s going on in their lives, showing that he cares about every single individual, and then discusses everyone’s agenda, and finally Rifkin gives everyone a general direction for the week.
I asked him, how to you share your passion when you’re thousands of miles away from some of your employees? He replied, “It’s really a matter of communication” he explained that it also deals with trust. “Everyone is paid really well, but they work hard.” Rifkin explained he is more of a providing manager, he gives his employees the tools they need to do their jobs and takes a step back.  
I admire this company because of their work ethic, scope, and objectives. I truly think that every firm should take the same approach to public relations and advertising because it allows the clientele to get what they want and the employees to thrive. 


word count: 430

Thursday, October 25, 2012

WAL * MART




Back in June of 2012, the corporate giant, WAL*MART, ran into a bit of a sticky situation. 

The article with the full story can be found at the following link: http://business.time.com/2012/06/15/wal-mart-pr-rep-poses-as-reporter-to-infiltrate-union-meeting/

Stephanie Harnett, an employee of Mercury Public Affairs (a firm that represents Wal-Mart), posed as a student reporter to "infiltrate a closed press conference held by a pro-labor group opposed to Wal-Mart’s new store." She said her name was Zoe Mitchell and was a student at the University of Southern California. Unfortunately, Wal-Mart and her employer And this is not the first time this has happened. An anonymous tipster told TIME magazine that she was in a similar situation years prior to this incident,  when she worked for Wal-Mart through a public relations agency, they asked her to sit in on anti-Wal-Mart gatherings and sentiments. And since these orders came from the public relations firm and not Wal-Mart, the tipster was under the impression that it was a common practice of the corporation.  

The big problem emerged when Harnett later appeared in her public relations role and handed out business card that had her real name, and position printed on it… a.k.a. the organization she lied to, realized she lied.

My worry is, when did lying and spying become tactics of public relations? I understand why you would want to know what your enemies are plotting.  In my studies, I have been taught that honesty, ingenuity, and creativity make the company, not stealing ideas, lying, and spying on your opponents. It does not matter that Wal-Mart denounced the incident, it happened, they have been tied to situations like this multiple times and it is probably not going away. All this does for me is discredit their head-honchos. However, I will not lie, I will still shop at their stores…. Mostly because they are incredibly convenient.

What?! You know Wal-Mart is cheap and easy! The head staff and the public relation firms associated with Wal-Mart do not directly my shopping experience.

Until next time! Have a good weekend!

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Wells Fargo - Do they have a PR department?




On July 13th 2012, Wells Fargo, the country’s largest mortgage lender, agreed to settle the charges being lead against them from 2004 to 2009. Wells Fargo was charged for implementing higher interest rates and fees on home loans exclusively for the minority community in America. Basically, Wells Fargo had created the equivalent of a racial surtax. This incident has been coined as “reverse redlining”. Back in the days of segregation, banks would refuse people of color loans for their homes. Reverse redlining is giving people of color clearance to buy homes that exceed their salary, loans they cannot afford, and interest rates they cannot pay back. This tanked many upstanding citizens’ credit scores, and created a financial set back that will be affecting the minority community for decades to come.

But what does this have to do with public relations?

An effective public relations team could have nipped this entire thing in the butt. A huge thing I have learned this year is that in a large company or organization the public relations department is most effective when they are involved with the decision making process and NOT just left to clean up after the mess has occurred. Don’t you think that maybe, just MAYBE someone could have foreseen the outrage of the public when it was released that a huge company was targeting Latinos and blacks? Was there anyone in that meeting that said, “Hey! That’s racist!”? Did anyone ask, “What if the public finds out? Are we going to be known as a racist company?”

Listen… public relation departments nation-wide have the ability to affect at least one of the following areas of a company: financial, reputation/brand equity, employees/internal publics, and public policy. Wells Fargo lost a lot of face and all four areas were impacted, they lost money because of the law suit, their reputation was damaged because of the racial discrimination, the bad publicity reflects badly on their employees and some of their employees were probably left in the dark, and lastly their public policy was damaged because it seems the company doesn’t have any respect for the public.

At the end of the day, Wells Fargo is still alive and well regardless of this incident. The public relations angle they are taking is reassuring the public that they will be more transparent, and return to their roots because after all, the company has been around for over 150 years. Eventually, this racial discrimination will be forgotten… well, maybe not entirely. But it will take a lot more than just a law suit to bring this company down. 

Thursday, October 11, 2012

PETA and Pokemon


As some of you may already know. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, have decided to use Pokemon as the means to gain awareness. It is called Pokemon: Black and Blue, Gotta Free 'Em All. The game that is posted on their site opens up as follows:
As battling Pokemon grew in popularity, generations of children were growing up believing that Pokemon exist for no other reasons than to be used and abused by humans... Children learned about dominance instead of compassion. While Pokemon faced the worst abuses, children also started bullying each other... until one Pokemon decided he'd had enough...
Cue  a battered and bandaged Pikachu battling some chick that has a bottle in one hand and a bloody bat in the other. Pikachu has attacks like thunder shock and quick attack, but he also has the ability to protest and give a group hug. While his opponent, Cheren, can use shock collars, tail docking, and discipline with a bat. When Cheren is defeated, (yes I did play the game) her personal Pokemon Tepig is released and travels with you. And guess what?! A nurse gives you a chest to unlock... and what happens when it's unlocked? You get a "bonus" video... like some kind of reward... to watch... too bad the video is a reel of animals in cages, and being mistreated. It is very uncomfortable to watch.

Now what does this have to do with Public Relations? It is a form of campaigning. Public Relations is not JUST about saving face for a company, it can also work to promote the company or organization. The release of the Pokemon parody is both wonderful and terrible. It is wonderful because it brings in a HUGE audience, but it is terrible because they are taking a globally loved game and show and inadvertently making it seem like it is actually bad for the kids who grew up playing it. Personally, I like the idea of the game, the fact that it gives lots of information in support if the company, but slandering a world-wide media giant that has given countless kids education and entertainment for years for you own gain is distasteful in my opinion. But I am assuming that PETA did get all of the legal rights from Pokemon to use their trademark so there is nothing to be done about it. In the end, Pokemon is introduced to an audience it did not have, and PETA was introduced to an audience is did not have. Whether to publicity is good or bad for either  is still to be determined in the future.

word count: 438

Thursday, October 4, 2012

Enron


Today I would like to examine Enron. Now, I’m aware that most of my audience was fairly young when this happened. Heck… I was 8 years old. I first heard about it in my Consumer Economics class in high school. So to give a brief recap, in December of 2001 Enron experienced the largest bankruptcy to date (later surpassed by Worldcom in 2002, and the Lehman Brothers in 2008). Although, prior to the scandal, Enron was a blue chip stock, also known as, as stock that can fair profitably in both good and bad times. The problem was, Enron’s internal and external auditors were “in on it” meaning they were aware of the creation of offshore entities to avoid taxes and the destruction of documentation. But most of the company did not know that their CFO (chief financial officer) Andrew Fastow led a small group of people to create companies that were not on company records to ensure him, his friends and family, hundreds of millions of dollars.
In 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) expressed interest in looking into the companies assets. You can see in the first three paragraphs of the following press release that Enron was ready to oblige.
This is quite intriguing because it seems that the executives were almost cocky about what they had done. They did not at all expect to get caught. This air of arrogance is what turns me off of their public relations. There is being open and transparent. Enron executives made it look like they were open AND transparent. Even though they did not take into consideration just how transparent they really were. 
Just as a reminder... openness is what you tell people up front, transparency is what people can find out. 
All in all, no degree of PR can help the monstrous scandal Enron concocted. And that is something to remember. Public relations should be involved in the process from the very beginning, that way they can attempt to be proactive in case something in the company goes wrong and a statement needs to be created and delivered. 

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Founders of PR

Today we're going to briefly discuss the names to remember in PR. The people that are responsible for the fundamental tools used in Public relations today.

First let's start with the Public Relations professionals that are associated with process.

P.T. Barnum (1810-1891) was a basically a low life scam artist. Often described as a scum bag, Barnum was known best for playing newspapers against each other.

Ivy Lee (1877-1934) Lee is remembered for successfully lobbying for a railroad rate increase from a reluctant federal government. Lee was also involved with Nazi Germany and was being investigated by the US Congress towards the end of his life.

Edward Bernays (1891-1995) Bernays is most associated with propaganda. In the 1920s he made it socially acceptable for women to smoke cigarettes in public. And then in the 1960s he worked as an anti-smoking lawyer for John Banzhaf.

Doris Fleischman (1891-1980) Fleischman was mostly associated with public relations strategy. But what she may be most famous for, is the fact that she was married to Edward Bernays. She was fantastic because she liked to cause a stir in the community. The biggest one is keeping her maiden name after marriage.

Professionals associated with Products

Eleanor Lambert (1903-2003) Lambert was a huge player in the American fashion public relations industry. Some of her big accomplishments were presenting American fashion to Russia, Germany, Italy, Australia, Japan, Britain, and Switzerland for the first time in history.

Al Golin (1929-) was most associated with comfort and convenience. But was best known for "cold-calling" McDonalds. Meaning that out of the blue... he called Ray Kroc (former CEO) and told him he should start a charity.

Moss Kendrix (1917-1989) Kendrix's defining moment was when he convinced Coca-Cola to expand their marketing and advertising because "black people are thirsty too."

Al Fleischman- is best known for Budweiser's advertisements using Clydesdale horses as the icon. Later he was hired on by the company Busch.

Now I know that I kind of rushed through each individuals description but at the end of the day, if you want to impress a potential boss, maybe throughout a name or two to show them not only are you qualified to work for their business but you know about Public Relations from the ground, up.

378

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Tony Hayward and the BP Oil Fail


One of the biggest tragedies that happened in 2010 was the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. But in addition to that, another tragedy was the statements issued by the former CEO of BP, Tony Hayward, following the largest oil spill in history. So today, using three of the key elements of what it means to be authentic, we will go through and hammer out why Hayward is NOT authentic.
Some companies put a lot of stock into showing off their CEO. Generally, it is a good idea to put a human face to a logo; to reassure people that some robot is not the one making the decisions for a nation-wide company. Unfortunately for BP, Tony Hayward was not a shining example of this like Steve Jobs was. Unleashing the CEO is a key element of authenticity according to GolinHarris’ PR firm. CEO’s are supposed to let the public know that, in fact, the public is incredibly important to them. Hayward, on the other hand, was incredibly selfish, publicly stating, “There’s no one who wants this over more than I do. I would like my life back.”1

Really, Tony?! You want this to be over more than the wildlife who lost a huge chunk of their habitat? More than the families that relied on the fish, and shrimp, and crustaceans to pay their bills? Oh, okay… this is about you.
NEXT, a huge part of a well-constructed image is using real words. Statements have the tendency to fall flat if they are not genuine. So Tony Hayward’s apology reel that aired after the spill did not ring as true with the American public. BECAUSE IT WAS WRITTEN FOR HIM! He was forced to apologize to the public to save the face of the company. The lack of authenticity was so great that the popular adult cartoon South Park made a spoof of it. 
The last thing we are going discuss is the element of Walk the Talk. In a nut shell, it means to avoid “greenwashing” the situation. To “greenwash” a situation is to make it seem that you are making less of a harmful impact on the environment than you actually are. A perfect example of “greenwashing” is when Hayward was quoted saying that the oil spill was “very, very modest”, and “relatively tiny” in comparison to the size of the ocean.


In the end, Hayward was asked to step down and was replaced by Bob Dudley as CEO. All he really proved is he is not good with crisis management and that large companies need someone who can look at the big picture that also includes the nation it involves.


word count: 451

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Disney and Corporate Social Responsibility

Today we are going to discuss corporate social responsibility and how Disney is a wonderful example of how it is done correctly. The primary example I will be using is Disney's Give a Day Get a Disney Day campaign from 2010. 

Corporate Social Responsibility or CSR is when a company does environmental monitoring, public relations audits, communications audits, and social audits. Now I know that the word audit is a bit intimidating, but it really only means to examine or inspect something to improve effectiveness and appropriateness. The before mentioned audits are put forth to maintain credibility, build solid relationships with the internal and external audiences and to manage issues. In doing so, Disney was able to come up with a plan that not only gave back to the community, but also get more publicity for themselves.

Here is a link to the promotional video for Give a Day Get a Disney Day.

Another trick they used in the video was using famous actors and actresses along with well-known Disney characters to get people interested. People may be more likely to turn out if Teri Hatcher is working alongside them. ;)

Helping out with school and park restorations, and building homes with Habitat for Humanity really drew the public eye to Disney. By catering to family oriented communities, Disney was able to promote volunteering as a whole and show kids that it can be fun to help out a neighbor. This also was a catalyst for parents to help out and get a free admission ticket to Disney if normally they would not have the ability to take their kids, or just give the family an excuse to go if they have not gone before.

All in all, by getting people to the Disney parks, Disney opened up a wider consumer base because people are more likely to come back if they have a good experience while they are there. This campaign improved their public image (which was not bad in the first place), improved communities in five major cities, and gave one million people the chance to experience the Magic of Disney.

word count: 354 

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Westboro Baptist Church Press Releases

Westboro Baptist Church

The Legitimacy of their Press Releases

     A big thing in public relations is authenticity. Knowing where you have been, where you are now, and where you want to go is your mission in public relations. Throughout my classes pertaining to my major, I have learned 12 key elements to be effective in communicating your message to the public. 6 of which I will be using tonight.These key elements will be the foundation of my future critiques.
      Now the Westboro Bapist Church (WBC) has a few different ways of communicating with the public. Members of the founding family, the Phelps, all have twitter accounts that they utilize by commenting on current events, actions of public figures, and announcing future pickets. In addition, the family runs a website tastefully entitled God Hates Fags. This website of course can be found at www.godhatesfags.com. Using examples from their website, picket announcements, and tweets I plan on explaining how the Westboro Baptist Church press releases and public image is by the book.
  1. Looking into a different mirror -- being able to take a different perspective.
    1. In regards to being able to use a different perspective isn't exactly WBC's strong suit. It is pretty much a "my way or the highway" type of organization. So in that respect, WBC fails to accept or entertain the ideas of others that do not hold their religious beliefs. 
  2. Link the product (message) to the purpose -- make sure your intended message matches up with the actual (perceived) message. 
    1. Being as their main goal is to inform the general public that they are going to hell, then, by definition, their message is linked to their purpose. The Phelps Family wants everyone to know that homosexuals are, indeed, going to hell. 
  3. Walk your talk -- do the things you promise or preach. This means finding your place in the world utilizing your time, talent, and treasure. 
    1. WBC does walk their talk. They take a stand against the people whose beliefs do not align with their own. They picket military funerals (because the military fights for a nation that is full of "fag enablers"), along with picketing other churches because they are "whorehouses masquerading as churches". View a press release at the following link. http://www.godhatesfags.com/fliers/20120821_Lenexa-KS-Churches.pdf
  4. Work inside-out -- making sure your internal publics, or the people within the organization, know what the message is and work to better your organization. That means being transparent, and having consistent communication.
    1. Having a rather small congregation of 40 people, it is easy for the Phelps family to communicate to everyone within their group. Having a transparent organization is different than exercising openness. Transparency is what people outside of the group can find out on their own, this means digging up things the organization may not want the general public to know. But since the WBC doesn't hide anything, this isn't an issue, therefore fulfilling this element.
  5. The Real Reality -- using real stories, real people, and real words.
    1. Well... if you ask anyone within the community, everything they say is true. But obviously, not everyone shares the WBC's views making it difficult for the public to connect with them. In this regard, I do not believe they fulfill this particular element. 
  6. Openness -- being completely honest and upfront with the audience.
    1. Like I said, the WBC doesn't hide anything, they want everyone to know and accept what they have to say. They post it on their website, and tweet about it.
Today he's in hell.  MT The tribute to former US Sen Ted Kennedy was remarkable,inspiring&passionate.


All in all, the Westboro Baptist Church fulfills four of the six key elements discussed today. That's a 66%... which is a D.... which is technically a passing grade... So I guess at the end of the day, I have to give this group some credit for at least utilizing their media resources for their exact purpose.     


Monday, September 3, 2012

Coming Soon! 

Westboro Baptist Church 

Tweets and Press Releases!



https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/1634041320/image.jpg

Tuesday, August 28, 2012


Welcome Public Relations students! 


To begin, we will examine the structure and a strategy exercised in Bill Clinton's preview to his State of the Union address from January 26, 1998. This particular press release has an interesting ending. Then we will delve into the official admission to the Monica Lewinsky scandal.


The address on January 26th 1998 kicks off with a smattering of thank you's. Thanks are giving to those watching, those in attendance, and to those who have helped former President Bill Clinton personally and professionally to reach the career point he was at. Which is all fine and dandy if you're one of the people being personally recognized. I think it is pretty much common knowledge that most important key to addressing ANY audiences is getting. their. attention. He gets to the point of the speech after about a minute of thank you's. Now don't get me wrong, everyone deserves their moment in the spotlight, there is nothing inherently wrong with giving people credit, however, even though I was too young to understand the discourse at hand, it is my belief that the people tuning in were there to gain information about the scandal that had been developing over the past months. This is where he employs some carefully thought out public relations strategy.

Clinton starts the remainder of the speech with a thesis,


Tomorrow, in the State of the Union Address, I will spell out what we seek to do on behalf of our children to prepare them for the 21st century. But I want to talk a little bit about education today and about this announcement in that context.

following that, he summarizes what they have accomplished over the past year in terms of education. This is what some public relations educators would call utilizing values. (obviously, there are other ways of saying that values matter.) Utilizing in the sense of speaking about what is important to people so they can A) connect with the speaker, and B) actually absorb the message at hand, otherwise, why should the public listen if you are not saying something that directly applies to them? Now that we've had our "term of week" let's move on to the decision made at the latter end of the speech.

He wraps up with this infamous conclusion,
Now, I have to go back to work on my State of the Union speech. And I worked on it until pretty late last night. But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again. I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time—never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people.    
this statement, the way it was delivered, starts off with Clinton portraying a driven All-American man that is working hard for the public to ensure we get the right information when we need it. Then... *dun dun duuunnnn* we get the "I want you to listen to me" blurb and it gives off an end of discussion kind of feel. To me it sounds like my mom when she says "This conversation is over, go to your room!" This concluding statement is great because he goes from hard working American, to framed, to a disgruntled hard working American.  
photo 28 of 32


That being said, the previous declaration of denial was refuted on August 17, 1998 after testifying to a grand jury. I'm sorry, but that is a flat out public relations DISASTER! I, personally, think he either should have fessed up right from the get-go, or denied, denied, denied. Keep your story straight. It is common knowledge to all communications majors that your writing needs to be clear, correct, concise, and complete. By denying the initial accusations, Clinton used ambiguity in his statements regarding Ms. Lewinsky, thus being unclear. He was incorrect because... well... he was lying. He was not concise because he was beating around the bush... no pun intended. And his message was not complete until months later. 

But on the bright side, we can learn from his mistakes. :]

Tune in next week! Westboro Baptist Church press releases will be on the chopping block!



The video of the January 26th broadcast can be found at the following hyperlink.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV6yhEbEw9c

The transcription of the January 26th broadcast can be found at the following hyperlink.
http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3930

The video of the August 17th broadcast can be found at the following hyperlink.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r4e5Wg4PDI

The transcription of the August 17th broadcast can be found at the following hyperlink.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/lewinsky_address/address.html

594 words without quotes or citations



Monday, August 27, 2012

Coming soon! 

A review of Bill Clinton's sex scandal with Monica Lewinsky!